Litigation and communication. The key to being a good lawyer and having
a successful legal career. Those unsuccessful at it usually become
politicians. What do you call a thousand lawyers chained to the bottom
of the ocean? Generally, a good start. An old joke but usually it
works just as well as "Take my wife, please!" Tom Cruise's character in
'A Few Good Men' said cases aren't won by the law, they're won by the
lawyers and a court case is a sales pitch and in 1990's 'Reversal of
Fortune', an observation is made that cases are usually won in the field
and not in the court room.
It isn't often that a court room movie comes along where the ending
isn't predictable. Left off of the American Film Institute's list last
year of 400 films nominated as the best in the first century of film was
Sidney Lumet's 1982 masterpiece 'The Verdict'. That film used silence
to permeate the film with astounding brilliance. Director Steven
Zaillian tries the same thing here and it is generally successful but at
times muted.
'A Civil Action' stars John Travolta as a Massachusetts lawyer who,
along with three partners, (William H. Macy, Tony Shalhoub and Zeljko
Ivanek) takes on a civil case in the form of a class action suit led by
a mother (Kathleen Quinlan) who wants answers to why some of the
children in the small town where she lives, have died of leukemia.
Twelve strange and unexplained deaths that all seem connected to the
town's drinking water and where a tannery operates - dumping thousands
of gallons of run off chemicals into the water. Quinlan says she
doesn't want money, just an explanation of why the children died and for
someone to apologize. The company hires a huge law firm whose lead
counsel (Robert Duvall) is an attorney who's practiced law for 45 years
and Duvall's character is one of the most interesting in the film. Not
a great performance but one of sheer wisdom both in and out of character
as Duvall gets many chances to upstage the people on screen that he's
working with but he falls just short of doing so.
John Travolta's performance is somewhat contained. He doesn't find a
lot of avenues to truly make his performance memorable but he does a
good job at making us believe he's a lawyer and our hearts go out to him
and and his partners when they make career decisions that bankrupt them,
and nearly destroy their lives. Perhaps the most disappointing thing
about the film is the use of John Lithgow as the judge. Like so many
other court room films, the judge is the least interesting character.
The two performances that won me over the most in this flick were those
of William H. Macy and James Gandolfini who plays a conscience stricken
employee of the plant who wants to help the plaintiffs because he has
many children of his own. One of the most memorable scenes in the film
has no dialogue. It is a dinner scene where Gandolfini watches as his
wife pours each member of the family a glass of water and he looks
skeptical about its effects. Macy is wrenching as the rebellious lawyer
wanting a quick fix and knowing when to cut his losses. Too bad no one
listens to him.
Director Steven Zaillian ('Searching for Bobby Fischer') and the Oscar
winning writer of 'Schindler's List', structures his film with his own
screenplay based on the book by Jonathan Harr, in a credible and even
manner while letting the story tower over any other aspect of the film
and since it's based on a true story, Zaillian compliments the material
even more by letting it think for the audience rather than the other way
around and in a film like this it's more than a compliment to the
public, it's a welcomed public service announcement in the form of a not
so obvious morality play!
Copyright © 2000 Walter Frith