| Reviewer Roundup |
| 1. |
 | Dragan Antulov |
 | review follows |
 |   |
| 2. |
| Steve Rhodes |
| read the review |
|    |
|
Review by Dragan Antulov
1½ stars out of 4
In 1991 Jonathan Demme brought the wrath of American gay
community on himself by having a sexually ambiguous character for
a villain in THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS. For that crime he had to
make amends with PHILADELPHIA two years later. It could be
argued that similar thing happened to Irish director Neil Jordan after
CRYING GAME, 1992 movie that had very negative portrayal of IRA.
Whatever his motives, Jordan had much more favourable portrayal
of IRA in MICHAEL COLLINS, 1996 biopic that dealt with that
organisation's legendary leader and Irish freedom fighter.
The plot of the film begins in 1916, while Ireland used to be part of
British Empire. Trying to exploit British involvement in WW1, group
of Irish nationalists stage famous Easter Uprising. Just like many
times in the Irish past, this valiant effort succumbs to the British
military might; most of the rebels are captured and many later shot.
Michael Collins (played by Liam Neeson), one of the survivors,
learned from that defeat and decided to fight British by
unconventional means. Three years later, while his comrade and Sinn
Fein leader Eamon de Valera (played by Alan Rickman) goes to
America to plead for Irish indepenedence, Collins sets up a small but
dedicated group of volunteers that would act as an underground
arm. Instead of openly confronting British, they would use hit and
run tactics against policemen and government officials and later melt
in the general population. In doing so Collins gains important ally in
the form of Ned Broy (played by Stephen Rea), policeman who starts
working as a mole within the heart of British security service. As a
result of Broy's information, Collins and his men are able to wipe out
all the informers and secret agents and thus put whole British
security apparatus in disarray. British retaliate on innocent civilians,
thus fuelling Irish resentment and broadening support for IRA. After
two years of bloodshed both sides are exhausted, and when the time
comes for negotiations, de Valera, who became envious of Collins'
popularity, gives him the unpopular task of leading negotiations. The
peace treaty gives Ireland freedom, but the island remains divided
between North and South; many Irish nationalists resent this so
much that Collins now has to fight another, even bloodier war and
receive military aid from his former enemies. This time people on the
opposing side include even his best friend Harry Boland (played by
Aidan Quinn).
MICHAEL COLLINS won prestigious Golden Lion award at Venice
Film Festival thanks to prologue that had pandered to that festival
jury's ultra-leftist sentiments. In the prologue Neil Jordan claims that
Michael Collins invented urban guerrilla warfare and later served the
inspiration for the famous and successful revolutionaries like Mao
Zedong. This is far from truth, because "urban guerrilla" (or
"terrorism") had been applied by many other revolutionary
organisations in the past. Furthermore, those who tried to copy
Collins' methods and achieve political aims through terror - whether
their political orientation was left or right - usually failed. On the
other hand, although the film had its deal of historical speculation
(especially towards the relationship between Collins and de Valera),
it couldn't be accused of inventing history. Most of the incidents
portrayed in the film really took place - it is their interpretation that
caused controversy, especially in Britain, where some accused Jordan
of being terrorism apologist.
MICHAEL COLLINS is more-or-less accurate, but being accurate and
giving complete picture of Irish Troubles are two different things.
Despite great deal of enthusiasm in his native Ireland for this project,
Jordan had to rely on Hollywood for this project and simplify the
story. So, MICHAEL COLLINS conforms to the usual stereotypes
about evil English oppressing poor Irish and never mentions
"Catholics" and "Protestants" - two words that symbolise the main
reason why Ireland remained tragically divided to this day. And the
negotiations between Collins and British government - the event that
sealed both Ireland's and Collins' fate - is simply not covered in this
film. Jordan, on the other hand, compensates those holes in the script
with spectacular scenes that reconstruct the period. In that Jordan is
aided by authentic locations and group of talented actors. Liam
Neeson, despite being significantly older than historical Collins, is
more than convincing incarnation of Irish leader. Jordan's old
associate Stephen Rea is very good as policeman who becomes
dedicated follower of a man he supposed to track, while Alan
Rickman, best known as a villain of DIE HARD, must turn into
Collins' arch-nemesis in the absence of British characters who could
serve that purpose.
All this could have produced an interesting and captivating film way
above the usual Hollywood standards of screen history. But Jordan,
in an attempt to make his story closer to American audience, made
another fatal mistake - he chose Julia Roberts, American movie
superstar, to play Collins' love interest Kitty Kiernan. To say that
Roberts was wrong for the role was understatement, especially when
we consider the large number of Irish and British talents who could
have handled the job. Presence of Roberts' character (although based
in history) is irritating and only takes precious time that could have
been used to give more historical exposition.
Perhaps this review might seem unkind to MICHAEL COLLINS, but
this criticism is probably mild compared with what awaits this film in
the future. In today's world it is difficult to imagine audience
sympathetic to the attempts that try to blur the line between terrorists
and freedom fighters.
Copyright © 2003 Dragan Antulov
|