Shortly into Stephen Daldry's "The Hours," adapted from the
novel by Michael Cunningham by the great English playwright
David Hare, I felt like sending out the Drumline folks with Christina
Ricci and Kirsten Dunst to lead the cheers..."What do we want?
Happiness! When do we want it? Now! "The Hours," which
cunningly weaves three separate stories about three women's
activities during the course of a single day, shows its principal
characters in various stages of depression. Unfortunately the
movie can reinforce the belief by some in the audience who do
not distance themselves enough to see the three as literary
figures connected in some way to Virginia Woolf's novel "Mrs.
Dalloway" that quite a large number of women suffer from
hormonal imbalances peculiar to the female gender: PMS, for
example. A more studied look would reveal the three to be
depressed for a variety of reasons, reasons that could put us men
into a funk as well: and may we anticipate a sequel that would
hone in on us males, the weaker sex?
Daldry faces an additional challenge: the women are from
different eras in distinctly varied locations.. How to show that the
more times change, the more they remain the same? Just watch,
as "The Hours" explores, well, hours, in the lives of women from
England in 1923, Los Angeles in 1951 and The Big Apple, 2001.
The film is framed by an event that actually occurred in 1941 in
Sussex, England, where world-famous writer Virginia Woolf
popped a large stone into her coat pocket, walked with
determination into the local lake, and drowned herself. As elicited
by the dialogue between Ms. Woolf (Nicole Kidman) and her
husband Leonard Woolf (Stephen Dillane), Virginia has a history
of hearing voices, blacking out, and feeling down down down to
such an extent that Leonard moves the family from London to the
sticks of Richmond. This ironically worsenes her condition, as a
visit from her big-city sister Vanessa (Miranda Richardson) with
three active kids in tow makes her realize what she misses by
having left her urban life. Similarly suicidal, Laura Brown (Julianne
Moore), living in L.A. with her stolid husband Dan Brown (John C.,
Reilly) and their six-year-old Richie (Jack Rovello), feels terrible
because Dan Brown does not look like Viggo Mortensen, baking
cakes for her husband's birthday somehow does not fulfill her to
the core, and the novel she's been reading, "Mrs. Dalloway" by
Virginia Woolf, gives her some funny ideas.. Clarissa Vaughan's
funk is the most incomprehensible. Stopping by daily to take
care of Richard Brown (Ed Harris), a poet who is dying of AIDS
and does not feel particularly cheerful about that (and who
happens to have been the six-year-old son of Laura Brown),
Clarissa simply realizes that she had much more fun a decade
earlier when she and Louis Waters (Jeff Daniels) were lovers.
Louis, by the way, became the lover of Richard Brown but more or
less abandoned him when Richard developed full-blown AIDS.
So you see, we're all connected. Virginia Woolf starts the cycle
of history, Laura Brown reads her novel, and Clarissa Vaughan
takes care of the son of the woman who read the novel.,
Photographer Seamus McGarvey captures the spirit of each era,
setting the 1920s in sepia while the innocent fifties almost breaks
into the pastel colors of "Far from Hollywood." Peter Boyle edits
sharply, moving freely from one decade to the other, allowing
everyone in the audience to see clearly how the women are
psychologically bound with one another. For example, when
Virginia is lying on her side, Boyle cuts into Laura, who is
reposing in the same manner.
And oh yes, there is a lesbian motif, as the frustrated Virginia
kisses her sister Vanessa on the lips while little Richard watches
in awe; the cake-baking Laura puckers up for her sister, Kitty
(Toni Collette); then, we are not surprised to watch a little
intimacy between the contemporary Clarissa with her live-in
girlfriend, Sally Lester (Allison Janney). One distinguished online
critic faulted the film largely because in his view the lesbianism is
dated as a theme, making this in his estimation the sort of story
that would attract tourist busses from Virginia crammed with
women who would show up at the box office in a desperate
attempt to become shocked. I see the lesbian theme as minor,
though, the real story being a psychological exploration of women
from different decades who share perpetual feelings of doom and
gloom.
Ultimately, the story is much ado about nothing. What is funny
in watching Woody Allen give in to his neuroses and Nicolas Cage
(in "Adaptation") opening his film comically with profound self-
doubts is treated in a serious fashion here, but the whole project
is literary more than cinematic. We do get into the heads of the
characters, but Michael Cunningham's novel, which I have not
read, is probably the better way to absorb this tale of trouble.
The make-up is astonishing. Does anyone doubt that Paul
Engelen, who made Ms. Kidman actually plain by fitting her with
Conor O'Sullivan and Jo Allen's prosthetic nose; and Kerry Warn
who gives Ms. Kidman a hair style that almost makes you
understand why Woolf is depressed, are Oscar-bound for their
particular talents? Ditto for Elaine Offers, who ages Julianne
Moore fifty years with just the right assortment of wrinkles to say
nothing of Philip Glass's eerie, signature music, which moves the
plot right along.
"The Hours" won "Best Picture" from the National Board of
Review, which is a stretch, but who wants to argue personal
taste? "The Hours" is a tribute to the unseen people in the crew,
the aforementioned make-up artists, who assure us that while
people do not change deep down, they can project wildly different
surfaces. Now which of these backstage geniuses wants to turn
me into Tom Cruise?
Copyright © 2002 Harvey Karten