|
Review by Harvey Karten
3½ stars out of 4
Americans under the age of fifty know about the 1950's only
from what they've read or heard from their parents or from the
movies. They're likely to think of that decade as a conventional
one, a man-in-the-gray-flannel-suit era, when the American dream
was a white picket fence, a dog, a comfortable, stable life and bad
music. To a degree this impression is correct. There's quite a
difference between the Age of Eisenhower and our own Modern
Times. Or is there? Todd Haynes ("Poison," "Safe," "Velvet
Goldmine") was, like most Americans today, born post- fifties and
yet affords us a major exploration of the dark currents underlying
the decade's surfaces.
Featuring Julianne Moore, attired spot-on by designer Sandy
Powell with a hair style that's more flattering than that worn by
Amy Irving for "Tuck Everlasting," Haynes's latest work with his
favorite actress takes us into the Hartford, Connecticut suburbs of
1957 (actually filmed in Bayonne and other parts of New Jersey)
to show us that while the outside world can well envy the wealth
that gives its principal character a style of life that most of the
world would die for, trouble brews when romantic dreams can
overpower even the most superficially fortuitous existence.
At first we think that Cathy Whitaker (Julianne Moore) and her
husband Frank (Dennis Quaid) are living the American dream
albeit one that is surprisingly without a dog. With one son(Ryan
Ward) always eager to get his pop's attention, an obedient
daughter (Lindsay Andretta) and a loyal maid, Sybil (Viola Davis),
they enjoy the trappings of wealth, made possible by Frank's job
heading the Hartford office of a major corporation. His social life
comes from playing ball with other executives while hers
encompasses the social whirl of catered affairs and tete-a-tetes
with her best friend, Eleanor Fine (Patricia Clarkson). Lives take a
sudden turn south in the family unit when Cathy's husband's
"working late at the office" turns out to be assignations with
another male while Cathy herself feels emotionally drawn to her
black gardener, Raymond Deagan (Dennis Haysbert). While
Frank pledges to "fight against" the "deviance" of homosexuality
by consulting a psychiatrist (James Rebhorn), his little secret
remains with him and his wife. Society comes down hard,
however, on Cathy, who is discovered by a malicious member of
her social circle entering a restaurant with her black gardener.
Haynes's movie is not simply a story about the fifties: more
important, it is filmed in the style used by big studios who often
shot melodramas in their lots and employed actors like Rock
Hudson, Lana Turner, Jane Wyman, Dorothy Malone, Robert
Stack, and Agnes Moorehead. "Far from Heaven" is splashed with
so much color that we're reminded of John Waters, and yet
despite what a few critics have said, I don't believe Haynes means
to be campy. He is, however, following the paths trod by the
theatrical genius Douglas Sirk, a product of the Germany of the
twenties and thirties, who catered to an audience love for
melodramatic stories. Sirk, like Haynes, put great care into his
sets and clothes. Both studied bourgeois society and both cast
light on what they considered the lifelessness and hypocrisy
within that class. The women are beautiful but anxious. They
realize that social conventions smother love and lovers. No matter
that the material in "Far from Heaven," like Sirk's own palettes,
are considered trite and soapy. The movie audience of the fifties
and, to an extent that going to the theaters today, depends on
sensation, glamour, sexuality, fear, and danger; at least those
who are not now addicted to computer graphics and Bruckheimer
blockbusting.
Moore and Quaid have a genuine chemistry. We see how
Cathy is bound by social conventions to be her husband's
companion, to entertain guests, and to have no real life of her
own. It's no wonder that when she begins to talk to her gardener,
when she discovers to her amazement at a modern art gallery that
he knows more about Joan Miro than she and for the first time
looks at him as a real human being, something in her awakens.
Or that Frank, having finally given in to his homosexual urges, is
willing to chuck away his entire bourgeois life, to give up his wife,
his kids and probably his high-power job to take up with a man
with whom he has fallen in love (though that "love" with a younger
guy may not last the season).
Aside from the captivating style, from the way that Haynes has
captured the mood of the 1950s, I think he wants us to ponder
whether we've really changed so much. Yes, things are different
now on a surface level. I went to high school in the early fifties
and did not see a single African-American in any class. After
college in Massachusetts (where African-Americans were almost
as scarce), I taught in a high school in Brooklyn, New York and
throughout my career in that particular place did not have single
black student. Today that same school has done a volte force,
going from 100% white to 97% black. We no longer look upon
blacks and whites walking together, even holding hands, as did
the gossipy women and even the men on the street in "Far from
Heaven." Nevertheless only a Pollyanna would say there is
gender equality today or racial harmony and, if you judge not only
from violent attacks against gays but from the insulting
commentary that passes the lips of so-called straights, we haven't
progressed that much at all. With the striking set designs, the
classic performances of Quaid, Moore and Haysbert, and a refusal
to fall into the trap of campiness, "Far from Heaven" may at first
distance us by its fifties-style of filmmaking but draws us moderns
right into the pain and conflicts of its characters.
Copyright © 2002 Harvey Karten
|