Think of someone you dislike intensely. No, don't pretend
you're a saint and wish forgiveness and peace for all. What
would you like to do to this person? Nothing wrong with
contemplating horrors: As Tony Esposito's friends sing in Frank
Loesser's "The Most Happy Fella," "Brother, you can't go to jail
for what you're thinking." The vast majority of us thankfully do
not commit serious violence even on those we hate, one of the
reasons being (I think) that violent movies purge us of the desire
for a while until the feeling comes back again. Then we go to
another revenge fantasy or shoot some bad guys on the X-box
and we're content. We take out our frustrations with the
punching bag as well, maybe by jogging, but never not forget
the role of films of revenge fantasy. "Kill Bill V. 1 & 2," "Walking
Tall," "Mystic River" are popular because through them we
sublimate our base desires. We feel better.
The latest of the genre, "Man on Fire," is a double whammy in
that it couples vengeance with redemption, focusing on a guy,
Creasy (Denzel Washington), who had been on a U.S. Special
Forces assassination team, took too many swigs of the bottle,
and is now wandering around the Mexican border and beyond
with his best buddy and former colleague, Rayburn (Christopher
Walken). Resigning himself to never working a decent job
again, Creasy is surprised when he passes an interview for the
job of bodyguard to little Pita (Dakota Fanning), though he's the
sixth applicant to the home of Samuel (Marc Anthony) and Lisa
(Radha Mitchell). Brian Helgeland ("Mystic River'), who wrote
the melodrama and director Tony Scott hint that Lisa, despite
living the good life with her allegedly rich husband, has the
immediate hots for Creasy and who can blame her?
At 142 minutes' length, "Man on Fire" could have been divided
into two parts like Quentin Tarantino's far superior, more
stylized fare, since "Man on Fire" does feel like a pair of films.
The opening half, the better one because it boasts some decent
dialogue much like "Kill Bill 2," also more effective than its
predecessor, Creasy who's in just about every scene and
effectively portrayed as a drunk by the marvelous Denzel
Washington registers a convincing performance as an
alcoholic. He pours a considerable amount of whiskey into the
coffee he's having with his friend Rayburn at a caf‚. When his
prospective employer asks him whether he has any faults, he
replies "I drink." Here's a guy looking so hard for redemption
that he's willing to risk his new gig by being self-destructively
honest.
Imagine the blow to his ego (to say the least) when Pita is
kidnaped outside her plush Catholic school and Creasy is left on
the pavement a bullet in his chest. (Can't bodyguards afford
bulletproof vests?) When the kidnappers fall prey to a bungled
ransom delivery, they announce that Pita has been killed which
prompts the guilt-ridden Creasy to relieve his sins in a deadly
struggle with La Hermanidad, the Brotherhood, a Mexican
mafia whose members include quite a few cops and higher-up
apparatchiks.
Where "Kill Bill" is an original, "Man on Fire" is formulaic.
Photographer Paul Cameron is virtually a character in the film,
with his tricky photography (some would same NYU film student
camera moves) including shifts of light and color enhanced by
rapid editing from Christian Wagner's clippers. But while the
picture has style, including some striking vistas of Mexico City
including Chapultepec Park, the Zocalo and an assortment of
slums on cobblestone streets, the predictability takes away from
Mr. Washington's excellent performance. Dakota Fanning steals
every scene in which she appears, the small daughter of a pair
of richniks who apparently hasn't a spoiled bone in her body.
Lina Wertmuller's favorite actor, Giancarlo Giannini, turns up as
a police chief with scarcely an Italian accent, rounding out a
movie that's suspenseful, easy to watch, if prolix, and marred by
the lack of a true breakthrough vision.
Copyright © 2004 Harvey Karten