Review by Dragan Antulov
½ star out of 4
Every now and then film viewers are looking forward to certain
titles simply because it have something that most of the other films
at the time lack. The author of this review must admit that he had
expected much from COOL WORLD, 1992 part-animated fantasy
directed by Ralph Bakshi. This movie was shot as a combination of
live action and animation, the protagonist was an artist and, finally,
the rating was PG-13 and thus indicated cartoon more adult and
less formulaic in comparison with best known animated films of
1980s and 1990s.
Protagonist of COOL WORLD is Jack Deebs (played by Gabriel
Byrne), comic book artist who leaves jail. His best work is "Cool
World", comic book series about fantasy world populated by
"doodles" and humanoids a.k.a. "noids". After few bizarre
incidents Deebs would find out that Cool World indeed exists as a
parallel reality and that one of their scientists found a way to
transport characters into our world. Things get even more
complicated for Deebs when he meets Holly Would (played by Kim
Basinger), animated character in the form of sex bomb that wants
to become real human being.
COOL WORLD is a huge disappointment, especially when we
consider that the problem of interaction between live action and
animated characters was solved by Zemeckis in WHO FRAMED
ROGER RABBIT four years earlier. Bakshi, on the other hand,
lacked ability to make this interaction credible or bound by some
sort of "rules" that are supposed to exist in fantasy world. The
result is complete mess - the tone of the film is schizophrenic, torn
between Bakshi's attempts to make this film more adult (eroticism
in this film is very explicit for Hollywood's cartoon) and commercial
considerations that mandated more infantile approach. COOL
WORLD also isn't helped by bad acting - Gabriel Byrne sleepwalks
through his role, while Kim Basinger unsuccessfully tries to play
femme fatale. Brad Pitt is, on the other hand, interesting in the role
of Cool World's policeman, although his character also suffers
from screenwriters disregard for logic. In the end, COOL WORLD
could be best described as a film stuck between the worlds and
thus unable to function in any of them - children would see it as too
dark and incomprehensive, while the adults would have little
understanding for its naivety and infantilism.
Copyright © 2002 Dragan Antulov
|