Roger Ebert makes a salient point in his review of the film,
noting an experience he had at the Hawaii Film Festival some
fifteen years ago a festival to die for since North Vietnamese
directors showed up with a group of their films the victors'
interpretations of the Vietnam War. One audience member,
says Mr. Ebert, noted that the word "Americans" was not even
mentioned in any of the North Vietnamese films and complained
that the Asian group treated us in the same faceless ways that
we have portrayed our enemies in our own war pictures. The
answer from one director was a surprise. Instead of stating that
"we consider our enemy a faceless mass," he explained that
"We have been at war so long, first with the Chinese, then, the
French, then the Americans, that we just think in terms of the
enemy."
If only we in the U.S. had that foresight which, strangely
enough, we did if only we interpreted the data in what now
seems the most rational way. We thought that the Chinese
were behind the Viet Cong (Vietnamese Communist) rebellion
against the pro-western South Vietnamese government. We
thought that if Vietnam "fell" to the communists, the rest of Asia
would topple as well into a strong group of anti-Western nations.
Wrong wrong wrong. The Vietnamese Communists did win and
not a single Asian country has "gone Communist" since. The
Chinese have been traditionally been the enemies of the
Vietnamese not their overlords.
Nothing new there...so how does Randall Wallace's movie
break any ground...tell us what we did not know before? For
one thing, Wallace treats the enemy as not faceless at all but
human beings just like us. Yes, we probably knew that they put
their pants on one leg at a time, but isn't it surprising how many
of us probably never considered asking ourselves that? In one
scene, a bespectacled North Vietnamese soldiers fixes his
bayonet to his rifle, takes a last look at a picture of his girl friend,
puts the book with the picture inside his shirt, and marches into
the fray not with a fearless, nationalistic look on his face but with
some deep breaths and beads of sweat pouring from his
forehead.
The human aspects of the war are far more prevalent on the
American side as Wallace shows us the officers at a U.S. army
base from sergeant to lieutenant colonel training before their
12,000 mile trip away from home and hones in on their
wives who are all young and pert and who say and do the most
predictable things. The weakest parts of the film center on the
sentiments of the women, who meet regularly under the de facto
leadership of Julie Moore (Madeleine Stowe), who is the wife of
Lt. Col. Hal Moore (Mel Gibson). To be fair, perhaps to be
consistently sincere Wallace is more intent on showing his
audience what really gets talked about on the army bases rather
than attempting to dramatize in a ham-fisted style. The
obligatory expressions of dismay cross their faces when they
learn that the local laundromat sports a sign "whites only" and
the owner is not referring to clothing. Is it really true that a
cleaning establishment doing business with an army base
seventeen years after Truman desegregated the units and
eleven years after the Supreme Court ordered deliberate
segregated schools unconstitutional would have such an
advisory?
"We Were Soldiers" is based on a true story of Hal Moore who
survived the war despite his insistence on being the first person
on the ground and his promise, carried out, to leave no man
behind. The battle scenes in the 'nam are more impressive than
the TV-level dialogue back home. Wallace is intent on showing
that heroism under fire is not about battling to defend your
country's flag but simply a struggle of the enlisted men to
survive. The story deals with a battle in November 1965, the
year that President L.B. Johnson escalated the American role in
the conflict by upping the troop level from 75,000 to 125,000.
The Americans are outnumbered, depending on superior
technology to avoid a Custer-style decimation, and indeed the
choppers which became the principal icon of the Vietnam War
from the American side are instrumental in taking out hundreds
of the enemy while fighter planes drop deadly napalm on the
North Vietnamese hiding in the jungles.
Bloody as the battle scenes are we see one man with half his
face and both his feet burned off by enemy fire, several taking
shots in the head and back when they least expect
them Wallace is at his best by showing the array of men who
gain their inspiration from the colonel. Greg Kinnear is the
daredevil pilot known as Shanekshit Crandall, Chris Klein plays
the young, blandly handsome lieutenant just starting a family,
Sergeant-Major Basil Plumley's role is played by Sam Elliott as
a crusty veteran known secretly to the men as Gramps, and
Barry Pepper has the teen-idol guise of a photojournalist who at
one point exchanges his Nikon for an M-16.
Wallace provides some respite from the intensity of the battles
by frequently cutting back to the wives at home, and makes the
point that pathetically, the army was not even ready to send
officers to the homes of the newly widowed women...An
ordinary cab driver makes the rounds like the Angel of Death
until Julie Moore tells the taxi company to deliver all the town's
wires to her for distribution to the hapless women.
We sense throughout that "We Were Soldiers" has more in
common with "Men of Honor" than with "Black Hawk Down,"
since off-the-wall histrionics are kept to a minimum in favor of
presenting a sober, balanced view of men under fire and wives
at home who have little else to do but care for their young and
wait hopefully. for the return of their men.
Copyright © 2002 Harvey Karten