Before addressing the problems with "The Time Machine," it's important
to note what the filmmakers got right. Director Simon Wells
(great-grandson of H.G.) and company have succeeded in making a snappy,
well-acted adventure packed with eye candy. The production offers
futuristic vistas, a sarcastic, possibly sentient holographic computer
named Vox (Orlando Jones), an idyllic village far above the ground, and
big, bad monsters. The movie is engaging enough that I plan to see it
again when it opens this Friday.
Still, because of some crucial missteps, I left the theater less than
satisfied because, for all the filmmakers threw in, they forgot to add a
sense of wonder.
Based on the revered novel by H.G. Wells and clearly influenced by
George Pal's 1960 cinematic adaptation, the film begins in New York City
at the turn of the last century, as scientist and inventor Alexander
Hartdegen (Guy Pearce) develops a device that will allow him to travel
through time. His motivation for creating the machine is a mission of
rescue. Four years earlier, his beloved Emma (Sienna Guillory) was
killed on the night of their engagement and he is determined to travel
back in time and prevent the tragedy from happening.
At this point, fans of the book and original film are likely thinking,
"Where did that storyline come from?" In the press notes, writer John
Logan ("Gladiator") explains, "In adapting the material for today's
audiences, we felt it would be more exciting, more interesting, to
create an emotional context for Alexander's building the time machine."
Big mistake. In addition to using his book to comment on socialism and
class divisions, H.G. Wells gave us a man out to prove his theory that
time was the fourth dimension. The political agenda in the original film
shifted to an anti-war stance, but shared Wells' portrait of the time
traveler as an explorer. He saw the marvels and nightmares of the future
and we shared the adventure with him, experiencing all the wonder along
the way.
But things are different in the remake. First off, there are no social
or political statements to be found - entertainment is the only agenda.
Second, Alexander's mission is to change the past. When his attempt to
undo Emma's death fails, he shoots into the future still determined to
find a way to alter events that have already occurred. His is a
fact-finding mission - he allows no time to savor what he sees. As a
result, everything feels rushed. We witness incredible advancements,
like the personal helicopters weaving past the super-skyscrapers of
2030, and horrific visions, including a stunning disaster in the heavens
that I won't detail here. Instead of drinking it all in, though, we are
shooed forward like tourists on a cut-rate package deal, caught up in
Alexander's breathless quest.
Incidentally, the scheduled late 2001 release of the film was postponed
because of a scene depicting a futuristic New York being pelted by
remnants of the aforementioned disaster. Those images, deemed
inappropriate in light of the Sept. 11 atrocities, were excised, but
once you see the disaster, you'll figure out what happened in the
missing footage.
Eventually, Alexander whooshes some 800,000 years into the future,
landing in the era of the Eloi and the Morlocks. In this portion of the
film, the changes made by the new guys are more successful. In the 1960
movie, the Eloi were vapid, lethargic white-robed human lambs ready for
slaughter and the Morlocks were blue-skinned, white-haired creepoids
with glowing eyes and no language, waiting in underground caverns for
the next Eloi harvest. They looked frightening, but turned out to be
absurdly easy to kill. In the new movie, the Eloi are a bilingual tribe
living in a simple life in their gorgeous elevated village. They know
what the Morlocks want them for and actively avoid capture. Alexander
meets and soon grows close to Mara (Samantha Mumba) and her little
brother, Kalen (Omero Mumba, Samantha's real-life sibling). As for the
Morlocks, while most are feral spies and hunters, a well-spoken humanoid
mind controller called the Uber-Morlock (Jeremy Irons) leads them (Simon
revived the mind controller notion from an earlier version of his
great-grandpa's story).
The sense of wonder (and later, despair) established so well in the
original film was aided immeasurably by bookend segments of the time
traveler, first explaining his theories to some Victorian colleagues and
later returning to recount his adventures to the men. That meticulous
groundwork is gone now - all that remains are appearances by Philby
(Mark Addy), Alexander's devoted friend, and Mrs. Watchit (Phyllida
Law), his faithful housekeeper. Cameo Alert: Check out the flower shop
early in the film. The man behind the counter is Alan Young, who played
Philby in the original film.
Regardless of its problems, the new incarnation of "The Time Machine" is
entertaining, despite an overbearing soundtrack that too often echoes
the theme from "Survivor." Had Simon Wells ditched the "save my lover"
motif and allowed Alexander to be a pure explorer, the film might have
been something more grand. But what's done is done. Rather than
continuing to mourn what the film is not, how better it seems to simply
try and appreciate what it is.
Copyright © 2002 Edward Johnson-Ott